Bartley Law Offices
Attorneys at Law
QUI TAM WHISTLEBLOWER
WRONGFUL TERMINATION
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
ANTITRUST
BUSINESS TORTS
CONTRACTS
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION
OTHER TORTS
INTERESTING CASES
Interesting Cases
 

 

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ex rel. Gerlinger v. Parsons-Dillingham Metro Rail Construction Manager Joint Venture -  False Claims Act qui tam whistleblower action on behalf of project finance manager, alleging over $60 million in overcharges on construction of Los Angeles Metro Rail subway system.  Intervention accomplished.

United States ex rel. Hendow v. University of Phoenix - False Claims Act qui tam whistleblower case alleging violation of Title IV of the Higher Education Act, which prohibits colleges and universities from providing "any commission, bonus or other incentive payment . . ." to recruiters based on recruiting activities. The ban was enacted 1992 amid reports of numerous institutions enrolling unqualified students, just to receive the federal student-aid funds from the government. At issue is more than $3 billion in federal funds obtained by the University of Phoenix.  Case supported by DOE investigation, report, and fine, and by DOJ amicus filing.

United States ex rel. Peck v. County of Shasta -  False Claims Act qui tam whistleblower action alleging Medicare fraud. Intervention accomplished.

United States ex rel. Solodoff v. Hamilton Taft Company - False Claims Act qui tam whistleblower action on behalf of controller, exposing and ending $100 million Ponzi scam perpetuated by San Francisco-based payroll tax processing firm against dozens of companies and institutions, including Sun Microsystems, Federal Express, Tandem, Stanford University, and the State Bar of California.  Case was front-page lead story in Wall Street Journal, March 15, 1991.

United States ex rel. Hansen v. Cargill, Inc. - First use of False Claims Act qui tam whistleblower action to challenge use of bogus "public interest value" appraisals to effect sweetheart land deals - a ubiquitous practice nationwide that reportedly causes losses to the United States Treasury in excess of those sustained incident to the savings and loan debacle.

United States ex rel. Ellis v. Catholic Healthcare West - False Claims Act qui tam whistleblower case alleging unlawful secondary billing of Medicare for treatment of patients covered by a third party payer contracts providing for "payment in full."

United States ex rel. Gilliam v. General Dynamics - False Claims Act qui tam whistleblower case alleging that General Dynamics misrepresented the dollar amount of its potential commercial business in order to obtain the $4 billion contract for construction of the third Seawolf nuclear attack submarine (the U.S.S.S. Jimmy Carter) without competitive bidding. 

Case Name Confidential - Whistleblower case for accountant employee of company that was defrauding its clients via double-billing, kickbacks, and other fraudulent billing practices. Employer brought legal action to silence client, whereupon we countered with anti-SLAPP motion.  Case resolved for $785,000.

Hill v. MacMillan/McGraw-Hill School Publishing Company - Eight out of eight federal jurors found breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in case alleging gender discrimination, resulting in substantial six-figure verdict.

People of the State of California ex rel. Spooner v. Pacifica Foundation - High-profile quo warranto action, brought on behalf of listener-sponsors, with approval of State of California Attorney General, challenging corporate governance abuses at Pacifica Foundation, a charitable trust that owns and operates a nationwide network of listener-sponsored free-speech radio stations.

Air Products v. City of Santa Clara - As Western Region Counsel of Container Corporation of America, conceived and managed class action and public referendum in in mid-1980's for pass-through of over $8 million in electricity rebates to City of Santa Clara electricity customers.

GC Micro v. United States Defense Logistics Agency - Landmark 9th Circuit decision recognizing right of small disadvantaged businesses to obtain, via FOIA, information on government contractors' degree of compliance with congressionally mandated quotas for providing government contracts to small disadvantaged businesses.

Csutoras v. KRPQ-FM - Sexual harassment and complainant retaliation case on behalf of a radio station advertising sales representative, tried before a jury, resulting in $928,404 recovery.  Reportedly the first sexual harassment case ever tried in Sonoma County Superior Court.

Case Name Confidential - Cybersmear Internet defamation action brought by high tech company against former employee. Swiftly negotiated confidential nominal settlement that entailed apology, that protected client's reputation, and minimized attorney fees and costs.

Case Name Confidential - Cybersmear Internet defamation action for small business against out-of-state individuals who were destroying client business via defamatory posts on Internet message boards. After successfully opposing anti-SLAPP motion and venue challenges, case settlement at mediation included stipulated permanent injunction protecting our clients.

Case Name Confidential - Employment law action against terminating employer and former employer, alleging, inter alia, causes of action for Labor Code § 970 misrepresentation, Labor Code § 1050 interference/blacklisting, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, breach of contract, defamation, negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair competition in violation of Business & Professions Code § 17200.  Case resolved for $1,317,595.

This is Attorney Advertising. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.